The case for TB testing review: PR perspective

Whilst so much of the world's attention has been on the crisis in Afghanistan, and rightly so. However, the national case of Geronimo, the alpaca, has continued.

The Story so Far

With the high court denying Helen's appeal for further testing, the case will likely result in the animal's death. When writing this, Geronimo is in the custody of the police and DEFRA awaiting his fate. Following this, a post mortem investigation will then be conducted. Helen is likely to do her independent tests. While many campaigners hope this can still be avoided if the situation cannot change, the results must be clear. DEFRAs vet will take biopsy's of the tissue and various cultures to assess the Geronimos health. This test needs to be done independently as well. Now Geronimo does not have any clinical signs of TB, which are weight loss and respiratory problems. Now visually, TB is challenging to diagnose, which is why a robust testing program is necessary.

The Impact on Testing

With a test for bovine TB essential for keeping cases down and alpaca ownership continuing to rise as more people take to various models of adding these animals onto a farm, testing is crucial. Now with the testing protocols being brought into question at present because of the case of Geronimo, the issue that is likely to happen is one where the voluntary test is proving highly inaccurate when an alternative is available. It will increase owner scrutiny. With the trial being voluntary once owners investigate the testing protocols in greater detail, owners will likely increase scrutiny, which is positive. However, as the trial is mainly voluntary at this point, the reduced confidence in the study would reduce not only the scope but further question its validity, increasing its overall cost and likely incentives offered to ensure necessary subjects are available.

Rounded Testing Regimes

The other element that needs to be considered is, does the current protocol use all of the available science to identify TB accurately. If we add this third test, there is no feasible alternative other than post mortem for further testing. Although we may still see some errors with the three tests, the additional test would increase validity and owner confidence. The likelihood of an animal failing a test due to a false positive across consecutive sampling is extremely unlikely, especially when the test has different approaches and methodologies will reduce the likelihood of farmers and owners going through lengthy appeal processes. 

A further focus

This additional phage test then opens doors further for testing once a valid treatment is available and brings into question the testing of cattle. An additional piece will focus on testing regimes in cattle and current issues or concerns to follow this article up. So what can we do whilst we desperately wait and want this case to end in a positive outcome? We also need to ensure that the focus and scrutiny does not move off of Bovine TB testing. A further change in testing is needed so that those with animals and livestock are not in the situation where the organisations do not fully utilise all the tools there to protect them.

Aus-UK Trade Deal

At a Glance:

On the 17th of June 2021, Australia and the UK signed a historic trade deal. Now both nations are seeking an ambitious free trade agreement (FTA). Now whilst the UK is mainly looking at the FTA as the first step in entering the pacific market, Australia is looking at boosting its ties with the UK consumer market. Whilst the UK will benefit from exports of Whiskey, Cheeses and Cars. Australia benefits from an increase in Agricultural access and industrial products. For countries with broadly similar systems and ways of working, easing restrictions on UK Australian working visas is also a big pull.

The Good:

With over 1.25 million ex-pats living in Australia, a core winner here is the young job seekers, the gap year adventures, and the entrepreneurs. Greater access to both countries education systems, markets and cultures allows for knowledge sharing, growth of existing companies or the formation of new businesses as both countries seek to explore the wealth of development in the tertiary and quaternary sectors. A core focus is how these two island nations can establish conduits of data flow with established protections maintained for both consumers. This presents opportunities for the UK and Australian firms to challenge the might of Silicon Valley. With the greater access, this would provide for a greater prospect for both nations to share both the skills of their respective workforces and provide an opportunity for businesses to flourish. With the UK and Australia already sharing cultural heritage, a free trade agreement would remove red tape to provide essential growth in these emerging sectors. 

The Bad: 

Whereas the deal is primarily heralded as an outstanding achievement and part of Britain reentering the global fray, we also need to recognise its limitations. Now the UK is both known for an exceptional standard of food quality and animal welfare; however, the provision for our farmers is far less robust than other countries. The Australian trade deal for all its benefits for opening up both emerging sectors and new avenues for trade also sees Australia benefit from a new market to sell its livestock and arable produce to now this in itself is not a problem until we address the broader issues. The UK is legislating for greater protection for animals already providing protection in slaughterhouses with CCTV, actively working towards reducing life transport and generally improving welfare standards of stock. The issues from the fact that many in the sector myself included seeing cheap imports as a potential loss leader that UK farmers cannot compete against due to quality or regulatory pressures.  Now, this could be remedied by further intervention from the government to protect the British agriculture trade through additional reinforcement of subsidies which would continue to enable farmers security of revenue so that they can steward the environment. We also have to reflect on the recent pandemic where without these key workers within this sector, UK food prices would have soared, but subsidy should not be the only tool. Subsidy should be a support mechanism for farmers to innovate and explore further opportunities, not as the critical area to ensure their survival which is where in the future we are likely going to need more robust packaging from trends in carbon footprints and welfare standards to the origin of products.

The Ugly:

As with many areas of new policy areas, we are likely to see far further detail in weeks and months to come, and the benefit of this detail may undoubtedly outweigh any cons. However, areas that are already becoming abundantly clear are that any trade deal needs to add value to our stores and the public without costing our domestic sectors. We must recognise that this deal will essentially become the benchmark for future agreements with other countries such as New Zealand and the United States, and the standards we employ need to ensure we can maintain our quality. This is where we need to think about what governments and sectors can do to ensure the British made standard is and Union Jack products are promoted as other countries will be focusing on promoting their products and not seeing our own produce increasingly priced out of the market. Whereas some would certainly and often rightly articulate that the market would be the best moderator to ensure that successful products or produce survive, we need to recognise holistic benefits of what we are trying to achieve and whilst tariff provisions are a solution, they are not a silver bullet. We need to think of what can be done to ensure that we are giving the right information with a greater abundance of produce. Making sure products are more accurately labelled and those items have information consumers care about as we already see levels of information vary based on the intensity of farming or sustainability of materials we need to reflect this on the packaging in the stores. Place of origin is also crucial and must be clear as we are already aware larger producers such as New Zealand Dairy could potentially use the deal to enter the UK milk market and price pinched farmers further out. 

To conclude:

The free trade deal in itself overs various opportunities for a plethora of sectors to benefit from further collaboration with a country we share so much with; however, we need to recognise that the deal must benefit the UK holistically and not sole sectors. Agreements need to ensure various sectors can benefit from these new agreements offering avenues to enrich our great nation and not solely focus on metropolitan sectors to see growth for our country and the success of domestic programs. Part of the levelling up agenda needs to recognise the key industries around our nation and areas where we can grow, not token offers or caveats.

Mental Health in Farming

With my articles over the last week, I have played close attention to Mental Health and specifically the impacts on isolation. Now, something which I want to focus on is isolated sectors in rural Suffolk. The isolated primary industry is that of farming. Agriculture is both an industry which has given me a great deal of opportunity and experiences.

Still, I would be remised if I said that you did not notice the effects of being disconnected from many outside of your farm. Now my experience was only brief, often seeing and visiting many farms which Faccenda Foods had ownership of or were contracting out their growing of broiler chickens. Now, although many of my experiences was visiting a variety of farms from large industrial sites with bungalows or living areas for the manager as well as maybe an assistant on-site, this was not often the case for smaller farms where the need for a second staff member on-site was not as justified fiscally. Now the farmers often had family members on the site where their kids and spouse often worked or studied offsite. The farmer primarily stayed on-site for the crop's duration, taking the odd day off throughout the six to seven-week cycle. When off relief staff would work on-site by travelling from other areas to cover the staff member temporarily, and when the site was being prepared for the next crop they would often take the opportunity to holiday away from the site. This chance to leave the area is usually not possible on the traditional farming business. When the land is not working or being prepared for work, it still needs management or other maintenance. Therefore this leaves the farmers working tirelessly for our communities year-round which is both a service and calling which many would not trade.

Now farming is quoted as having one of the worst safety records, which is exaggerated by the number of time farmers spend working in isolation. The larger farms will often see collaboration between owner and employee or generally between generations. Smaller sites are may be unable to justify offering work outside the family and if there is no one within the household to assist then the work can be more isolating. The long hours in the fields tied with the many hats they have to wear; mechanic, accountant, weatherman, and engineer. Now when your livelihood and to an extent your history is deeply rooted in your land, the looming financial uncertainty is a deep concern. With the risks around changes to income and direct payments changes looming post-Brexit, the stress can be too much for those with no one to talk again. This is why the work that charities such as YANA do is so valuable and the results of educators like myself to highlight these groups to the next generation is critical. The Mind Your Head campaign, which I will discuss later this week, needs to be shared and continually championed. After all, although we see shifts in our habits or dietary preferences and sometimes are attitudes, we need to remember the differences in our communities highlight them and ensure that we all continue to move forward together. 

Biodiversity is the World Now Waking Up

With the recent Biodiversity summit addressing the needs of wildlife are we finally waking up to Natures needs? Alternatively, is this another global initiative where we sign up to different arbitrary targets which the countries of the world will not meet?

We are aware of our fundamental need to understand nature from an academic point of view preparing the next generation of scholars to conserve our natural world, helping us address how to live with it. When linking this to other academic disciplines such as agriculture and food production, we have to understand how we both produce the resources we need sustainably. However, what do we need from nature other than what we produce, such as; the living and non-living environment.

A leading issue, however, is although many of us are becoming increasingly aware of our impact on nature, we need to do more seventy-five percent of the Earth's surface has been directly affected by human needs and endeavours leaving nature only small pockets of unaffected areas left. Many scientists argue to this degree that we are in the next mass extinction of our planet. Once an exceedingly large number of the world's animals and plants have gone extinct in short succession, this has led to the classification of a Mass Extinction. The planet has already gone through five, and we are arguably in the sixth due to human impacts. The question then that the UN biodiversity report aims to prevent is the rapid extinction of many of these species within the next decade.

Now, why is this fundamentally we do not live sustainably within the environment you only have to look at recent events such as starting to move toward a low plastic world but then once face-masks became the norm an equally damaging incarnation replaced the old litter. Often the lack of care taken for our planet will vary well have far-reaching impacts if we do not have the care to act soon, and this varies from the individual citizen to the large corporations. Now alongside a duty of stewardship for our planet, we have to reflect on both trends which are impacting the Earth the loss of forests as well as valuable topsoil due to desertification and deforestation. This accompanied with 2020s most talked about crisis the coronavirus has highlighted how interconnected we are to the fragile ecosystems of the world, and we ignore the signs at our peril. By often trading in exotic animals and low standards of biosecurity and welfare, we increase the risk of zoonoses and disease emergence.

Now in the case of some animals, if they can adapt, they may well survive the impacts we have had on their populations such as the African Elephant which has displayed changes in the tusk length due to natural selection now favouring short tusked individuals due to increases in poaching of the long tusked individuals. Now whilst plants and animals that we use are abundant in terms of their number, we use relatively small varieties focusing on select families of plants and animals for given functions. This is because they fit our demands for them. However, we also do not know what other discoveries await us, and we must ensure that we leave ourselves the opportunity to do this as a move toward a more sustainable direction. To delve into more detail of how we can do this, we must address both sustainable measures, locally, nationally and internationally.